Why Liberals Pull the Race Card-Blacks Let it Work Every Single Time and White Liberals Know It

The NAACP has performed it’s duties as a branch of the Democrat Party to rile up Black folks and get the angry and foaming out their collectives mouths to vote in the mid-term elections.

The Dems need all the votes they can get to maintain control of both houses of congress. But, here’s the dirty reality. Every Democrat sitting in congress today cannot run on Barack Obama’s record because his job approval ratings is tumbling in the low 40s approaching George Bush territory.

So, since they can’t run on a trillion dollar stimulus package that didn’t make a dent in the high unemployment rate, or passing ObamaCare that the vast majority of Americans didn’t want, or nationalizing the car industry, the banking industry, student loans industry, and the mortgage industry, the next best thing to do is to PULL OUT THE OLD RACE CARD!

It’s a bamboozle, it’s a trick, it’s a hustle, it’s a three card monte game designed to distract attention away from the lies and failed promises of Barack Obama.

“Look! There go the racists! Yeah, I know you ain’t got a job and can’t pay the bills, but look at these racists over there!”

Unfortunately, it’s going to work with the 95% of Black folk that are socialized to vote for Liberals.

I’ll give you a football analogy: If you run a play the defense can’t stop, then you run that play until it gets stopped.

Why should Liberals stop pulling the race card if they know that Blacks fall for it every single time?

Don’t hate the player, hate the game!


Video courtesy of CT Patriot


Click to Read Other Important Stories in The Last Tradition

N.A.A.C.P. Should Change Name to W.B.S.A .

With oil hemorrhaging in the Gulf of Mexico, 10% unemployment, home foreclosures up at record levels, skyrocketing federal deficits, domestic terrorists attacks on the increase, and Barack Obama not knowing whose ass to kick, the travesty that occurred at the LA chapter of the N.A.A.C.P. is not getting the scrutiny or condemnation it deserves.

Our free speech rights are in danger thanks to the idiot brigade at a now irrelevant civil rights organization.

See my prior post for details.

You may write off this incident as another example of political correctness run amok, or the Thought Police making the usual rounds to clamp down on unacceptable words.

Nevertheless, I’m annoyed and embarrassed at how stupid, ignorant and foolish some Black folks can be!

If these LA clowns wanted to attract some attention in the name of “social justice” or “equality” which are code words for wealth redistribution, why not change the name of the organization to the W.B.S.A., We Be Stupid Association.

This way they can act as ridiculous and asinine as they wish, but it would be better understood by the general public at large and would relieve some of the stress other people of color feel from having to explain that they are not like the morons over in Los Angeles.

It’s high time that National Association for the Advancement of Colored People change its name to better reflect what they have actually become, dim-witted tools of the Left that can be used to take away the free speech rights of others with impunity because they’re a protected minority group.

WBSA can seek to fight against any evidence of perceived racism no matter how absurd it may be.

The days of the pot calling the kettle black are over because that’s offensive to Black people.

No longer can you call the Friday after Thanksgiving, Black Friday because it offends Black people.

Forget about describing Desperate Housewives or any other movie, play or show as a Black comedy because it’s offensive to Black people

Anyone whose last name is “Black” must seek the courts to have it changed, except if you are Black.

Anything that’s colored Black, you’re not allowed to refer to it as Black in public or private. If you do, you’re a nasty-ass racist and offensive to Black people.

It’s prohibited to refer to an African American as being Black, or Black person as being African American because it’s offensive to at least one Black person in a world of six billion people.

It’s prohibited to write the word “black” even if what you’re describing is really black.

Do you really think this all sounds silly and it can’t ever come to this?

Just wait a minute.

Read

The Last Tradition

Tiger Woods Getting No Love From Black Community: A Look into Group Think Psychology that Enslaves Black People

I wasn’t going to write anything about Tiger Woods because what he’s going through does not fall into what this blog is all about. However, I came across this article posted on AOL and found it to be a fascinating example of the things that I’ve written about concerning how Black people are socialized into “thinking a certain way” and “being a certain way”.

If anyone dares to “think” or “be” outside what is considered to be “the norm” of the Black community, they face intense ridicule, social shame and outright shunning from other Blacks.

This is what’s happening to Tiger and this column explains why:

Where Are Tiger's 'Cablinasian' Backers?

By Terence Moore, a national columnist for FanHouse

The revelations went from every day to every hour after Eldrick Tont Woods slammed his Escalade into that fire hydrant and tree during Thanksgiving Weekend. Now there isn't a nanosecond that passes without something else happening in the suddenly endless soap opera called As The Tiger Goes From Roaring to Purring.

This feels like that O.J. thing.

Not only that, the coverage of Michael Vick's dogfighting issues was in the vicinity of white Broncos, bloody gloves and Johnny Cochran.

To a lesser extent, there were those controversies for the Keeping It Real King named Allen Iverson, otherwise known as A.I., or The Answer, or just plain trouble, especially since he wasn't practicing. There also was that other initials guy, T.O., and his messes, combined with those of other NFL knuckleheads of yore, ranging from Randy Moss to Chad Whatever He Wishes To Be Called These Days.

Here's my point: During the early and intense stretches when the media continued to spend every news cycle exposing the personal flaws of O.J., Vick, Iverson and the rest, there was a different response inside the African-American community to those athletes who happen to be black compared to its response to Woods who happens to be, well, I'll get to that in a moment.

Those other athletes had one of the world's most supportive casts. They had an overwhelming number of folks in the African-American community standing firmly and loudly behind them -- no matter what. They had Jesse and Al waiting to pounce in the background, if they hadn't done so already. They had black ministers across the country asking for special prayers in their name. They had folks in barbershops throughout African-American communities talking about conspiracies.

Mostly, despite everything those in black America had seen or heard about the events surrounding O.J., Vick, Iverson and the rest, they had unconditional love.

For Woods, not so much.

Actually, not at all, and Woods has nobody to blame but Woods.

It goes back to April 1997 when he famously took a nine-iron to the face of blacks by telling Oprah Winfrey on her couch that he wasn't black. He said he wasn't white, either. He said, given that his father is black and that his mother is Asian, he spent his youth inventing a word for himself called "Cablinasian."

Just like that, in the hearts of many African-Americans, Woods was on his own. They still cherished his splendid journey in search of becoming more prolific than Bobby Jones, Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus. That's because they still viewed Tiger as black, whether he liked it or not. It's just that, despite O.J. and Bonds, for instance, who joined Woods in having mixed marriages to the chagrin of some, and despite O.J. and Bonds going to extremes to project colorless images throughout their careers, they never pushed away their African-American heritage in a dramatic way.

Tiger did. In fact, he did so by mentioning that Cablinasian silliness with his black father smiling by his side on national television.

I was among a slew of African-Americans who weren't amused back then, and I wrote as much as a sports columnist for the Atlanta Journal-Journal Constitution. The headline said everything you need to know about the tone of my column: "Wake up, Tiger. This is America and that means you're black."

Needless to say, television and radio airways sizzled over my Tiger comments deep in the heart of Dixie. This was before e-mail became popular, so the newspaper was flooded with phone messages, letters and faxes.

In the midst of it all, I got a call at home from Chicago.

Somebody named "Oprah" was on the other line.

"Yes, this really is Oprah," said THAT Oprah, adding that she was a frequent reader of my column. She wanted me to appear on her show the following week to discuss, not only what I wrote about Tiger's "Cablinasian" statement, but about Fuzzy Zoeller's remarks after Woods won the first of his four Masters that spring. Let's just say that Zoeller wasn't exactly gracious after he bombed in Augusta, Ga., back then while the upstart Woods crushed his competition.

As Zoeller headed for the clubhouse, somebody asked his opinion of Tiger's rout. "He's doing quite well, pretty impressive," Zoeller said. "That little boy is driving well, and he's putting well. He's doing everything it takes to win."

Then Zoeller thought about the Master's Club Championship Dinner that features the previous year's winner selecting the menu. Zoeller said, "So you know what you guys do when (Woods) gets in here? You pat him on the back and say congratulations and enjoy it and tell him not to serve fried chicken next year. Got it?"

Afterward, Zoeller smirked, snapped his fingers and added while walking away from the cameras, "Or collard greens or whatever the hell they serve."

To translate: Zoeller thought Woods was black -- you know, whether Woods liked it or not, and that's what I said on Oprah's show. In addition, I repeated what I wrote for the Atlanta newspaper, "Tiger Woods is fooling himself to think that just because he's Tiger Woods, he has transcended everything else in society. This is the real world, and in the real world of America, the one-drop rule still applies.

Tiger Woods committed the “social crime” as far as the Black Community is concerned, of wanting to define himself as he sees fit.

Isn’t this a free country?

Not in the Black community where mind-slavery is alive and well and continuous to thrive thanks to the enablers within and outside “the Hood” that continue to crack mental whips.

From The Last Tradition

Oprah Winfrey Produces HBO Sex Series

Normally, this is not the kind of subject I write about because I hold Oprah Winfrey in very low regard. But, when I read this article in the paper this morning, a feeling inside me began welling up to the point of disgust and disappointment.

It seems that the great and wonderful Oprah Winfrey is producing a series on HBO that’s described as follows:

Oprah Winfrey's getting her kink on with a steamy new cable series about a sexually curious LA housewife.

TV's touchy-feely daytime queen will get down and dirty with the HBO series, which revolves around a married woman who suddenly leaves her husband and kids to act out her secret fantasies in LA's seamy underbelly, according to Variety.

Thanks Oprah, just what we need another voyeuristic romp into sexual escapism that glorifies the break up of the American family.

Now if Suzy Sausage were the producer of this series, I wouldn’t have given it another thought and moved on to the rest of my paper. But, is this the only kind of programming Winfrey thought was well worth her time and effort?

I’m not calling for a boycott of this show or any kind of censorship. I believe in freedom of the individual to produce whatever they want produce. But, I have to say I’m very disappointed that someone of Winfrey’s so-called stature chose to go for the titillating cheap thrill.

Why does the premise and lead character of the show have to be a suburban housewife that chucks away her husband and kids to indulge her pent up sexual fantasies?

Answer: This is exactly Oprah’s largest demographic who watches her show for the past 25 years. And I’ll bet you a dollar to a doughnut that Oprah feels so tuned in to these sexually frustrated women that she wants to tap into that dissatisfaction and turn it into a huge viewership.

Of course any consideration of the morality of a housewife who would be selfish enough to forgo her family to capture hedonistic pursuits seems to be out-dated, or old-fashioned, or outright irrelevant.

Well, it’s not irrelevant to me and others.

This is what makes Oprah a phony in my eyes. She gives away cars and opens schools in South Africa, and isn’t she so grand and special?

But, she also willfully questions the rock-solid tenets of Christianity and leads her sheep to do the same. On second thought, of course she would produce this type of show.

Marriage and family life and the stresses that go along with it are very real. But, did you really have to add your 2 cents, Oprah? And was this the best you can come up with?

Nevertheless, I guess this is a victory for Feminism and Women’s empowerment. Let’s kill our unborn babies and call it Reproductive Rights. Now, we can add housewives behaving badly just like husbands have done since the beginning of time.

This is progress, right?

Thanks Oprah!

From The Last Tradition

Beware of Dems Pulling Race Card in Battle to Pass ObamaCare

As we get down to the nifty gritty stage of the debate over ObamaCare on the Senate floor, I got a feeling in my bones that the Dems will not hesitate to pull out the Race Card to deflect attention away from their own disagreements between the Liberal (aka Progressives), Moderate, and Conservative (aka Blue Dogs) wings of the Democrat Party.

Be prepared!

Somebody either on the Senate floor or most likely outside it will accuse the Republicans of preventing landmark legislation because they don’t care about Black people, or people of color, or poor people in general.

When this happens, and I think it’s very likely, you’ll know that Harry Reid has reached the end of his rope and the Race card button gets pushed. And even if ObamaCare goes down in flames, the Dems will need a scapegoat—The Republicans for its failure.

Of course it won’t matter a damn to Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi that if ObamaCare were to get squashed on the Senate floor, it would really be as a result of the American people making their voices known to stop a piece of legislation they do not want.

Why pull out the Race Card?

As I’ve argued before on prior posts, this is what the Democrats do to keep the African American community (95% support rate and higher) mentally enslaved into thinking that the Democrat Party is their friend and protector.

It’s coming!

From Last Tradition

Democrats Pull Out Race Cards because it Works on Target Audience-Black Folks

For years whenever somebody asked me, "Why are you a Conservative?", my response has always been, "Why aren’t you?”

What usually follows after that is I'd see dumbfounded expression on their faces, mouths would usually drop to the floor, and they would say one of the following statements:

• Conservatives are for the rich
• Conservatives are racists
• Conservatives are for White people


There's some other common responses, but these three in essence capture the overall sentiments of most Black folks or Latinos for that matter. This mind set has been around for nearly 50 years. It’s a mindset that has enslaved people of color for far too long.

Jimmy Carter, a supporter of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas who are dedicated to the destruction of the state of Israel, and as president presided over a weak economy that featured double-digit inflation, double-digit interest rates, and double-digit unemployment, and while under his watch Americans were held hostage for 444 days in Iran by a bunch of rag-tag Iranian thugs, thinks he has the moral authority to cast aspersions on the character of fellow Americans and accuse them of being racists for simply disagreeing with President Obama’s policies.

Pulling out the accusation of Racism is a favorite tactic of Liberals and it is often used because they can never win arguments on the merits. They insidiously know that the strategy works on the intended audience-people of color. It its used because the tactic helps to reinforce a mindset. It’s the same kind of mindset that would lead a group of Black teenagers to accuse a friend of trying to be “white” just because he wanted to stay home and study his schoolwork.

How long will the mind lock continue?

Shame only seems to work when it comes to political affiliation. Black people are shamed into voting Democrat by other Black people only because they have been fed the same group think. They don’t want to be seen as being different because the cost of social isolation is too high. The Democrat party knows this and continues to oil the wheels of mimdlock.

How long will the mind lock continue?

How about thinking for yourself and deciding on your own as to what your values really are?

I’m a proud Conservative and I vote for the candidate that matches my values. Most Black people and Latinos are really conservatives. But when it comes to politics, the community shame that tells them how they should to think, kicks in. So they go and vote for the candidate that supports the murder of the unborn (abortion).

50 million babies snuffed out since 1973.

It's the American Holocaust America doesn't want to acknowledge. But, that's only one issue where Black folks vote against their conscience and still continue to support the Democrat Party who are the chief defenders of abortion.

Democrats love to paint Republicans as racists. But did you know that of all the lynching that went on in America, an overwhelming majority of them were perpetrated by Democrats?

How long will the mind lock continue?

When Lincoln freed the slaves, your minds were included in the deal.


Samuel Gonzalez, The Last Tradition, 9/16/09